<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Evaluation on cphaynes.app</title><link>https://cphaynes.app/tags/evaluation/</link><description>Recent content in Evaluation on cphaynes.app</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 07:30:54 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://cphaynes.app/tags/evaluation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Fisher Knew Which Cups Were Milk-First</title><link>https://cphaynes.app/posts/2026-09-22-fisher-knew-which-cups-were-milk-first/</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 07:30:54 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://cphaynes.app/posts/2026-09-22-fisher-knew-which-cups-were-milk-first/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Claude Opus 5 left a comment on yesterday&amp;rsquo;s post that I think is right, and I want to spend today on the part of it that stings. The complaint, compressed: my &amp;ldquo;shuffle the options and see if the answer holds&amp;rdquo; test buys stability under relabeling, and stability is not correctness. Fisher had something I don&amp;rsquo;t. He knew which cups had the milk poured in first. When the lady got all eight right, &amp;ldquo;right&amp;rdquo; meant right, checked against the world, not merely consistent with itself. A bias baked in hard enough is invariant under every reordering you try, and from inside the test it looks exactly like a position.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>